Blueprint for fair demolition compensation

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, June 9, 2011
Adjust font size:

The central government is requiring that compensation for properties reclaimed for demolition equal at least the market price to protect property owners' rights and interests and reduce related conflicts.

The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said on its website on Tuesday that work on property evaluation must be done by a qualified third-party rating institution, chosen after consultation with local residents.

The notice also required that the value of land where the property is located as well as indoor decorations and relocation settlement costs be taken into consideration for compensation.

The notice follows a regulation on home demolitions that was approved by the State Council, China's Cabinet, in January, which aimed to end forced relocations by governments.

According to the regulation, local governments are forbidden from using administrative powers to forcibly demolish residents' properties, and disputed cases shall be determined by courts.

Analysts said the latest notice was of great importance in setting fair compensation for home demolitions, which have provoked a number of high-profile incidents during forced relocations in recent years.

"The central government strived to establish fairness in a series of rules on property evaluation. It's an obvious improvement," Wang Xixin, a law professor in Peking University, told China Daily on Wednesday.

Wang is one of the five law professors who wrote an open letter to the National People's Congress, the top legislature, urging a revision of the country's demolition regulation at the end of 2009 - an event that captivated public attention.

Wang said there are still some loopholes on detailed procedures for property evaluation, which would weaken its credibility among the public.

"For instance, according to the notice, local governments will pay for the expenses on property evaluation. In this case, property owners will query the credibility of evaluation institutions when they can't get expected compensation," he said.

Also, property owners should have the right to choose institutions from across the country, instead of the current limited choices among local institutions, he added.

Li Chang'an, a public policy professor at the Beijing-based University of International Business and Economics, said whether local residents could make good use of their rights would also be a big problem in the future.

"There were always many households living on the same street. Therefore, it will be difficult to decide on an ideal institution for property evaluation as everyone has different choices," he said.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产乱人伦偷精品视频免下载| 大香伊蕉在人线国产75视频| 久久青青草视频| 毛片女女女女女女女女女| 免费视频www| 美女被吸屁股免费网站| 国产亚洲精品精品精品| 激情图片在线视频| 国产精品伦子一区二区三区| 95免费观看体验区视频| 妓女嫖客叫床粗话对白| 中国一级毛片在线观看| 日本精品视频在线观看| 久久综合狠狠色综合伊人| 欧美亚洲国产日韩| 亚洲成人高清在线观看| 永久免费AV无码网站在线观看| 偷自拍亚洲视频在线观看99| 精品国产v无码大片在线看| 四虎国产欧美成人影院| 色悠久久久久久久综合网| 国产人妖chinats| 韩国理伦大片三女教师| 国产在线精品一区二区在线看| 另类欧美视频二区| 国产精品jizz观看| xxxx日本在线| 国产精品久久99| 男女拍拍拍免费视频网站| 国产精品毛片一区二区| 777奇米四色| 国产羞羞视频在线播放| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 在线免费观看色片| JIZZYOU中国少妇| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁中文字幕| 一级毛片成人午夜| 市来美保在线播放| yellow高清在线观看完整视频在线| 岛国片免费在线观看| 一区二区三区视频|