www.ccgp-fushun.com
November 13, 2001



War Cost: Nearly US$1Billion a Month

A US helicopter lost in Afghanistan a week ago cost up to twice as much as the government spends yearly on scenic byways. Each cruise missile is worth several American homes.

The total expense of the Afghan war may be nearly as hard to find as people hiding in Afghan caves. By one estimate, the military assault is costing US$500 million to US$1 billion a month - and above the US$1 billion in promised US economic assistance to Pakistan, and debt relief for the country.'

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a private research group that closely examines the cost of war, offered that monthly figure. Precision is impossible without knowing more about how many bombs are being dropped and what is happening with US forces on the ground, among other variables.

Still, parts of the war are adding up: the estimated US$5,000 an hour to fly a Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber, the US$25,600 cost of one of the frequently used Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, the top-of-the-line Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As for a running total, "It's very much ballpark," said Steven M. Kosiak, the center's director of budget studies. Some other analysts have projected higher costs.

Stretched over a year, the price of the war could be US$12 billion, half of what the federal government spends on medical research.

By comparison, the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 cost the United States about US$3 billion.

The 1991 Persian Gulf War cost America an estimated US$61 billion, but all but about US$7 billion was reimbursed by allies. By some accounting methods, the United States may have even made a profit.

Munitions at the disposal of US forces in the Afghan war vary wildly in price.

From the bargain basement: the 500-pound M-117, dropped from a heavy bomber, for a mere US$300 apiece.

At the high end: Tomahawk cruise missiles costing US$600,000 to US$1 million each, many times more than the US$147,100 median price of an American home.

US officials said 50 Tomahawks alone were launched in the opening assault, some from British forces, making an expensive debut. Dependence on cruise missiles has lessened since then.

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Hansen said it takes time to calculate costs above those normally associated with having forces abroad in peacetime.

"The Department of Defense will be collecting those figures but at this point, a month into the conflict, we don't have them," she said.

On the home front, a study has taken a stab at the costs of the September 11 terrorist attacks and all their fallout - an expense likely to dwarf the costs of the Afghan war.

Peter Navarro, an economist at the University of California in Irvine, calculated US$100 billion in costs so far, nearly half from lost productivity, sales, advertising dollars and airline revenue in the immediate aftermath. That is apart from stock market losses.

Long-term costs are so speculative and dependent on government policy that Navarro did not add them up.

But his calculations do include "terrorist tax" items costing billions to make flying safer. They include US$20 to US$40 an hour for the time each person wastes by going to the airport 90 minutes earlier.

"The stakes here are simply breathtaking," Navarro wrote in the report for the Milken Institute.

To assess the cost of the fighting overseas, budget analysts at least have the experience of past wars to draw from.

Kosiak came to his projection in two ways: one using costs of strike missions over Kosovo and Iraq and applying them to the current conflict, the other by adding up everything known about the Afghan campaign.

Altogether, he calculated that the first 25 days cost US$400 million to US$800 million.

Munitions used on the Taliban include 15,000-pound BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bombs, costing US$27,000 each. The bunker-busting GBU-37 costs US$231,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

America lost a Pave Low helicopter - valued at US$40 million, about double last year's budget for National Scenic Byways projects - in bad weather in Afghanistan, and an US$11 million Black Hawk chopper in Pakistan.

A sampling from private researchers of price tags and estimates concerning the Afghan war and terrorist attacks: War:

-JDAM bomb: US$25,600

-Tomahawk cruise missile: US$600,000-US$1 million

-MK-82 "dumb" bomb: US$600-US$1,400

-BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bomb: US$27,000

-GBU-37 bunker-busting bomb: US$231,000

-Black Hawk helicopter of type lost in Pakistan: US$11 million

-Pave Low helicopter of type lost in Afghanistan: US$40 million

-Hourly cost of flying Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber: US$5,000

-Estimated war cost per month: US$500 million-US$1 billion Attack Aftermath:

-Property damage: US$10-US$13 billion

-Lost economic output: US$47 billion

-Projected airline security: up to US$41 billion

-Economic stimulus package: US$100 billion in legislation passed by Republican-controlled House, US$66.4 billion in Senate plan favored by Democrats.

( China Daily 11/12/2001)

In This Series
References

Archive

Web Link


Copyright © 2001 China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn,infornew@public.bta.net.cn
Tel: 86-10-68996214/15/16

主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天操2018| 日韩欧美一区二区三区免费观看 | 免费不卡在线观看av| 草莓在线观看视频| 天堂一码二码专区| 亚洲国产美女精品久久久久| 真实国产乱子伦久久| 国产成人精品第一区二区| 5555在线播放免费播放| 手机看片你懂的| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 精品久久久久久无码人妻| 国产不卡在线看| 韩国毛片在线观看| 国产麻豆成人传媒免费观看| selaoban在线视频免费精品| 日韩制服丝袜在线| 亚洲精品在线视频观看| 老师我好爽再深一点的视频| 国产精品日本亚洲777| 中文亚洲av片不卡在线观看| 日本a∨在线播放高清| 亚洲国产精品免费在线观看| 毛片毛片毛片毛片出来毛片| 人人爽人人爽人人爽人人片av| 精品国产一区二区三区av片| 可以免费看黄的app| 老王666天堂网站| 国产一区二区精品人妖系列| 香蕉啪视频在线观看视频久| 国产黑丝袜在线| 999精品视频在线观看| 在线观看亚洲人成网站| acg里番全彩| 天天插在线视频| free性泰国女人hd| 女人张开腿让男人捅| 一区二区三区影院| 日本三级电电影在线看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人av东京热| 日韩中文字幕不卡|