www.ccgp-fushun.com
November 22, 2002



War Cost: Nearly US$1Billion a Month

A US helicopter lost in Afghanistan a week ago cost up to twice as much as the government spends yearly on scenic byways. Each cruise missile is worth several American homes.

The total expense of the Afghan war may be nearly as hard to find as people hiding in Afghan caves. By one estimate, the military assault is costing US$500 million to US$1 billion a month - and above the US$1 billion in promised US economic assistance to Pakistan, and debt relief for the country.'

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a private research group that closely examines the cost of war, offered that monthly figure. Precision is impossible without knowing more about how many bombs are being dropped and what is happening with US forces on the ground, among other variables.

Still, parts of the war are adding up: the estimated US$5,000 an hour to fly a Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber, the US$25,600 cost of one of the frequently used Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, the top-of-the-line Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As for a running total, "It's very much ballpark," said Steven M. Kosiak, the center's director of budget studies. Some other analysts have projected higher costs.

Stretched over a year, the price of the war could be US$12 billion, half of what the federal government spends on medical research.

By comparison, the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 cost the United States about US$3 billion.

The 1991 Persian Gulf War cost America an estimated US$61 billion, but all but about US$7 billion was reimbursed by allies. By some accounting methods, the United States may have even made a profit.

Munitions at the disposal of US forces in the Afghan war vary wildly in price.

From the bargain basement: the 500-pound M-117, dropped from a heavy bomber, for a mere US$300 apiece.

At the high end: Tomahawk cruise missiles costing US$600,000 to US$1 million each, many times more than the US$147,100 median price of an American home.

US officials said 50 Tomahawks alone were launched in the opening assault, some from British forces, making an expensive debut. Dependence on cruise missiles has lessened since then.

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Hansen said it takes time to calculate costs above those normally associated with having forces abroad in peacetime.

"The Department of Defense will be collecting those figures but at this point, a month into the conflict, we don't have them," she said.

On the home front, a study has taken a stab at the costs of the September 11 terrorist attacks and all their fallout - an expense likely to dwarf the costs of the Afghan war.

Peter Navarro, an economist at the University of California in Irvine, calculated US$100 billion in costs so far, nearly half from lost productivity, sales, advertising dollars and airline revenue in the immediate aftermath. That is apart from stock market losses.

Long-term costs are so speculative and dependent on government policy that Navarro did not add them up.

But his calculations do include "terrorist tax" items costing billions to make flying safer. They include US$20 to US$40 an hour for the time each person wastes by going to the airport 90 minutes earlier.

"The stakes here are simply breathtaking," Navarro wrote in the report for the Milken Institute.

To assess the cost of the fighting overseas, budget analysts at least have the experience of past wars to draw from.

Kosiak came to his projection in two ways: one using costs of strike missions over Kosovo and Iraq and applying them to the current conflict, the other by adding up everything known about the Afghan campaign.

Altogether, he calculated that the first 25 days cost US$400 million to US$800 million.

Munitions used on the Taliban include 15,000-pound BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bombs, costing US$27,000 each. The bunker-busting GBU-37 costs US$231,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

America lost a Pave Low helicopter - valued at US$40 million, about double last year's budget for National Scenic Byways projects - in bad weather in Afghanistan, and an US$11 million Black Hawk chopper in Pakistan.

A sampling from private researchers of price tags and estimates concerning the Afghan war and terrorist attacks: War:

-JDAM bomb: US$25,600

-Tomahawk cruise missile: US$600,000-US$1 million

-MK-82 "dumb" bomb: US$600-US$1,400

-BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bomb: US$27,000

-GBU-37 bunker-busting bomb: US$231,000

-Black Hawk helicopter of type lost in Pakistan: US$11 million

-Pave Low helicopter of type lost in Afghanistan: US$40 million

-Hourly cost of flying Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber: US$5,000

-Estimated war cost per month: US$500 million-US$1 billion Attack Aftermath:

-Property damage: US$10-US$13 billion

-Lost economic output: US$47 billion

-Projected airline security: up to US$41 billion

-Economic stimulus package: US$100 billion in legislation passed by Republican-controlled House, US$66.4 billion in Senate plan favored by Democrats.

( China Daily 11/12/2001)

In This Series
References

Archive

Web Link


Copyright © 2001 China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩美女视频一区| 亚洲精品视频免费在线观看| 久久精品国产精品亚洲艾草网| 美女私密无遮挡网站视频| 国产精品视频免费视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久 | 777奇米影视四色永久| 成人国产一区二区三区| 亚洲人成综合在线播放| 精品久久免费视频| 国产成人精品久久一区二区三区| hd日本扒衣党视频播放| 日韩人妻无码精品无码中文字幕 | 美女黄频免费网站| 国产精品一区二区久久国产| 一个人www免费看的视频| 明星xxxxhdvideos| 人人人妻人人澡人人爽欧美一区| 野花日本免费观看高清电影8| 国精产品一区一区三区MBA下载| 久久久久久人妻一区精品| 欧美成人免费全部观看天天性色 | 亚洲av无码一区二区三区性色| 男女午夜性刺激| 国产午夜久久精品| 37pao成人国产永久免费视频| 怡红院在线播放| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷| 正在播放黑人巨大视频| 又爽又黄又无遮挡的视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲成色二本道三区| 天堂а√在线官网| 丰满少妇人妻久久久久久| 欧洲美熟女乱又伦av影片| 免费a在线观看| 色老头老太xxxxbbbb| 国产精品亚洲五月天高清| а√最新版在线天堂| 成人在线观看不卡| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码| 日韩精品一区在线|