RSSNewsletterSiteMapFeedback

Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / International / International -- News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Bush defends policies on interrogating terrorism suspects
Adjust font size:

US President George W. Bush defended Friday the government policies on detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects as successful and lawful.

"When we find somebody who may have information regarding an attack on America, you bet we're going to detain them, and you bet we're going to question them," he said in his official Oval Office.

US President George W. Bush pauses during remarks on torture and the economy in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, October 5, 2007.

Bush made the remarks following a report in Thursday's editions of The New York Times disclosed that shortly after former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales took over the Justice Department in 2005,two memos were issued to authorize the use of extreme interrogation tactics on terror suspects, which has been denied by the White House and the Justice Department.

"The American people expect us to find out information, this actionable intelligence, so we can help protect them. That's our job," he said. "This government does not torture ... we stick to US law and our international obligations."

Highly trained professionals were assigned to question the "extremists and terrorists," and they have already obtained information from "these high-value" detainees that help protect Americans, Bush said.

Meanwhile, the White House "have been fully disclosed" the interrogation techniques to Congress, he added.

After the Justice Department publicly declared torture "abhorrent" in December 2004, the first memo was issued that authorized the use of head slaps, freezing temperatures and simulated drownings, known as water boarding, in interrogating terror suspects, said The New York Times report.

The second Justice opinion was issued later in the year while Congress was working on an anti-torture bill.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said Tuesday in a statement that neither of the two memos violated the December 2004legal opinion that still remains in effect. "Neither (former) Attorney General Gonzales nor anyone else within the department modified or withdrew that opinion."

However, Senate and House Democrats Thursday demanded to see the reported secret memos that authorized painful interrogation tactics against terror suspects.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller sent a letter to the Justice Department saying the government would risk its credibility if not turning over the documents to Congress. "Why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States?" he questioned in the letter.

The American Civil Liberties Union also called for an independent investigation on the Justice Department's torture opinions, calling the memos "a cynical attempt to shield interrogators from criminal liability and to perpetuate the administration's unlawful interrogation practices."
 
(Xinhua News Agency October 6, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Username   Password   Anonymous
 


China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
-Chinese compatriots withdraw from Chad
-Gabon's Jean Ping elected as AU Commission chief
-Baghdad market blasts kill 72
-World Bank chief to assess floods in Zambia
-Kenya's rivals agree to end deadly violence
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一级精品高清一级毛片| 浪荡女天天不停挨cao日常视频 | 美国十次啦大导航| 国产性感美女在线观看| 中文字幕人成乱码熟女| 最近中文字幕在线mv视频7| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码久久99| 色婷五月综激情亚洲综合| 国产性生交xxxxx免费| xxxx69中国| 国产裸体舞一区二区三区| 久久丁香五月天综合网| 永久免费AV无码网站YY| 免费无码一区二区三区| 美国一级毛片完整高清| 国产一区二区精品久久岳| 高清粉嫩无套内谢2020| 国产片AV片永久免费观看| 51在线视频免费观看视频| 处女的诱惑在线观看| jizz大全欧美| 好男人手机在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产2021 | 欧美丰满熟妇BBB久久久| 亚洲欧洲日本在线观看 | 国产欧美va欧美va香蕉在| 1000部羞羞禁止免费观看视频| 国产黄大片在线视频| 99久久精品费精品国产| 天堂俺去俺来也WWW色官网 | 欧美大片在线观看完整版| 亚洲日本中文字幕天天更新| 欧美黑人粗暴多交高潮水最多| 亚洲美女免费视频| 色综合久久综合欧美综合图片 | 日本高清视频色wwwwww色| 国产精品理论片| 18国产精品白浆在线观看免费| 国产超爽人人爽人人做| 97人洗澡人人澡人人爽人人模| 无码国模国产在线观看|