--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other International Organizations in Switzerland
Foreign Affairs College
Institute of American Studies Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Bush Doctrine: Hegemony Claim or Jungle Law
Professor of politics at La Trobe University Robert Manne criticized Monday the Bush Doctrine as hegemony claims or jungle law.

The professor published on The Sydney Morning Herald an article titled "Kill first, ask questions later," in which he said the new idea of the pre-emptive strike in reality is a strategy not of pre-emptive strike but of preventive war because the Bush doctrine proposes military action against "rogue states" when no threat to the United States is imminent.

"For a preventive war to be launched, a state needs only imagine itself to be under threat. With such an idea, the line between self-defense and aggression becomes hopelessly blurred," he said.

The professor analyzed, "The danger of this conflation of pre-emptive strike and preventive war is aggravated precisely by the fact that the Bush doctrine makes it clear that the United States reserves to itself the right to strike unilaterally, without mandate from the established processes of the United Nations. Under the new doctrine, then, the United States may not only go towar on the basis of an imagined threat. It also arrogates to itself the right to decide alone when such a threat exists."

"At the center of the doctrine, a huge conceptual hole appears.Does the United States, as the world hegemony, alone possess the sovereign right to act unilaterally against a supposed threat to its security by prosecuting a preventive war, or does an identicalright exist for other states?" he asked and concluded "If the right does not exist for others, the Bush doctrine amounts to an almost formal claim to US world hegemony. If, on the other hand, all states possess the same right, the Bush doctrine opens the warto the return of the jungle, where the powerful have the capacity to impose their will."

As the United States steps up its war preparation against Iraqand the Australian government inclines to support it, anti-war voice gets higher in the country. On Saturday, about 1,000 Sydney residents launched a large-scale protest warning the government not to involve in any war on Iraq. On Friday, a group of 450 activists announced they had formed a "No War On Iraq Coalition." On Thursday, three former prime ministers and one former governor-general along with other former political and military officials issued a public letter opposing a US unilateral military action against Iraq.

(Xinhua News Agency September 30, 2002)

Military Supremacy at Core of US Security Goals
Sept. 11 Terror Attacks Reshape US Security Strategy
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产美女自慰在线观看| 青娱乐国产盛宴| 女人被男人狂躁免费视频| 久久久不卡国产精品一区二区| 欧美videos极品| 亚洲欧美日韩自偷自拍| 男女猛烈无遮掩免费视频| 哪个网站可以看毛片| 雄y体育教练高h肌肉猛男| 国产欧美一区二区三区在线看 | 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇| 久久精品国产亚洲av水果派| 欧美亚洲国产精品久久高清| 国产一区在线mmai| 国产成人精品一区二区秒拍| 国产精品无码久久久久久久久久 | 欧美丰满熟妇BBB久久久| 亚洲精品免费在线| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠97不卡 | 奇米综合四色77777久久| 一级片中文字幕| 放荡的女老板bd中文在线观看| 久久国产高清视频| 日韩毛片在线视频| 五月天婷婷伊人| 欧美40老熟妇| 亚洲人成电影院在线观看| 精品国产免费人成网站| 四虎影视永久在线观看| 色狠狠一区二区三区香蕉蜜桃| 国产偷久久久精品专区| 香港三级绝色杨贵妃电影| 国产大秀视频在线一区二区| 99热这里只有精品免费播放| 草莓视频污污在线观看| 国产美女mm131爽爽爽毛片| 99久久精品国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久人妖| 国产色在线视频| 在线天堂bt种子| 99久久精品免费观看国产|