Risk evaluation needed for GM food

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, April 29, 2012
Adjust font size:

The public's attitude toward genetically modified (GM) food should encompass a greater scope than simply supporting or objecting to the practice, said industry experts.

Despite continued controversy regarding its safety, GM food has found some supporters among the Nobel Prize laureates and other experts attending the third World DNA and Genome Week currently being held in Xi'an, capital of Shaanxi.

Richard Roberts, who was awarded the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, said GM food is even safer than traditional food, as its transgenic technology allows for the use of smaller amounts of water and pesticide in harsh environments.

Professor Ian Campbell from Australia's Peter MacCallum Cancer Center agreed, saying that no scientific evidence showing that GM food is harmful to people's health has been presented to date.

Campbell noted that campaigns against GM food in Europe have had political underpinnings.

GM food is widely believed to have the potential to solve global hunger and malnutrition problems, and to help protect and preserve the environment by increasing yields and reducing reliance on chemical pesticides and herbicides.

However, there are many challenges ahead, especially in terms of safety testing, regulation and international policy. Many of the forum's attendees called for more risk evaluation and stricter regulations for GM food and transgenic technology.

Martin Evans, a Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine in 2007, said the belief that transgenic technology is safe is not entirely founded and any conclusion should be based on testing results.

Dr. Alan Christoffels, director of the South African National Bioinformatics Institute, held the same view. He said that since GM food remains a controversial issue, scientists should continue testing to make it safer.

People do not trust GM food because transgenic technology is not well-regulated, said Michael Brower, a senior federal policy director from New York.

Brower said he believes the public should have the right to know which foods are genetically modified, adding that food producers should keep the process transparent for the public.

"The comprehensive evaluation of the risks of GM food and the strict regulation of the development of transgenic technology are vital," said Li Xing, a professor at Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University in Xi'an.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩av激情在线观看| 爱情岛论坛亚洲品质自拍视频| 国产精品久久久久9999高清| 他强行给我开了苞| 翁与小莹浴室欢爱51章| 国内精品久久久久久影院| 一区二区三区免费高清视频| 欧美一卡2卡3卡4卡免费| 亚洲精品成人网站在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区AV性色| 国产精品夜间视频香蕉| 99在线观看视频免费精品9| 少妇被躁爽到高潮无码文| 亚洲av无码专区国产乱码不卡| 欧美精品人人做人人爱视频 | 可以免费观看的毛片| 蜜桃成熟时33d在线| 国产在线精品国自产拍影院同性| 性刺激久久久久久久久 | 欧美日韩亚洲电影| 亚洲福利视频网| 海角社区hjb09| 人人揉人人捏人人添| 男女一边桶一边摸一边脱视频免费| 午夜一区二区三区| 精品熟女碰碰人人a久久| 国产模特众筹精品视频| gay精牛cum| 巨大欧美黑人xxxxbbbb| 两根手指就抖成这样了朝俞| 手机在线观看精品国产片| 久久久久88色偷偷| 日本中文字幕黑人借宿影片| 亚洲天堂第一区| 毛片免费vip会员在线看| 亚洲网站www| 添bbb免费观看高清视频| 亲子乱子xxxxxx| 爆乳少妇在办公室在线观看| 国产三级放荡的护士| 野花国产精品入口|