Home Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Work reports on justice, prosecution
Adjust font size:

Chinese top judge Xiao Yang said since the Supreme Court took back the power of reviewing death sentences from provincial courts since Jan. 1 last year, the capital punishment has been "strictly, cautiously, and fairly" meted out to the tiny number of serious criminal offenders in China.

"The transition work has been smooth, orderly and trials of death sentence cases normal," Xiao, president of the Supreme People's Court and chief justice, said in his work report to the ongoing session of the Parliament, without elaboration.

Xiao said the SPC has in the past year improved the procedure for second instance trials of death sentence cases and the procedure for the final review of death penalty with unified criteria applied.

"The SPC has been working to ensure that the capital punishment only applies to the very few number of felons who committed extremely serious, atrocious crimes that lead to grave social consequences," Xiao told the lawmakers.

Xiao did not give the figure on how many people were executed last year. However, presiding judge of the SPC's First Criminal Law Court Huang Ermei said in a recent media interview that the supreme court rejected 15 percent of death sentences for reasons including facts to be clarified, lack of evidences and procedure faults since the beginning of last year.

Rozi Ismail, president of the higher people's court of the northwestern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, told Xinhua that immediate executions after sentences in the region were reduced by half last year compared with 2006.

The SPC taking back the power of reviewing death sentences is a major reform in China's criminal justice system, which provides procedural guarantees for preventing misjudged cases and safeguarding offenders' legal rights, said the Xinjiang judge.

Legal professionals have observed that with the resumption of SPC death sentence reviewing right, local courts have already become more cautious in issuing death orders.

Chinese justice community agrees that death sentence is necessary for the country at the present stage to serve as a powerful deterrent against crimes for the maintaining of social stability and national security, and in the meantime China should reduce the number of capital punishments till this penalty is finally abolished when conditions are ripe.

     1   2   3   4    


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- Female members of NPC & CPPCC
- White paper published on China's rule of law
- Xinjiang Party chief on top of terrorists' wanted list
- Female working staff at NPC & CPPCC
- Key energy reserve blueprint on anvil
Questions and Answers More
Q: What kind of law is there in place to protect pandas?
A: In order to put the protection of giant pandas and other wildlife under the law, the Chinese government put the protection of rare animals and plants into the Constitution.
Useful Info
- Who's Who in China's Leadership
- State Structure
- China's Political System
- China's Legislative System
- China's Judicial System
- Mapping out 11th Five-Year Guidelines
Links
- Chinese Embassies
- International Department, Central Committee of CPC
- State Organs Work Committee of CPC
- United Front Work Department, Central Committee of CPC
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费看美女隐私全部| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲影视| 国产在线看片网站| 8天堂资源在线| 女人扒开腿让男人桶| 丰满岳乱妇在线观看视频国产| 男生和女生在一起差差的很痛| 国产亚洲国产bv网站在线| av一本久道久久综合久久鬼色| 新婚娇妻倩如帮助三老头| 亚洲日本香蕉视频| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕| 双乳奶水被老汉吸呻吟视频| 色综合67194| 国产免费观看网站| 国产99在线|亚洲| 国产精品人人做人人爽人人添| 99久久伊人精品综合观看| 女人战争免费观看韩国| 两腿之间的私密图片| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区影院 | 欧洲三级在线观看| 免费在线观看你懂的| 精品黑人一区二区三区| 国产日韩精品欧美一区喷水| 2022福利视频| 少妇真实被内射视频三四区| 中文字幕国产视频| 无码精品日韩中文字幕| 久久久久久久人妻无码中文字幕爆| 日韩在线免费看网站| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热| 最近中文字幕mv高清在线视频| 亚洲www在线| 清超市欲目录大团结| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合网站| 国产精品亚洲精品青青青| 色噜噜综合亚洲AV中文无码| 欧美精品在线观看| 四虎www成人影院| 老汉色av影院|