Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
How much is too much?
Adjust font size:

It's high time we prevented government officials from using public funds to travel overseas for leisure in the garb of business trips, says an article in Yangtze Evening Post. Excerpt:

The Guangzhou marine affairs court recently rejected accusations that six of its officials went on a sightseeing tour overseas, wasting a lot of public money.

According to their statement, the six court officials paid a 12-day visit to three foreign countries for "exchanging ideas and inspection". They said the court approved the visit, and the expenditure "did not exceed the budget".

The public was caught by surprise as the court came out with the statement defending its integrity.

People thought the court might be afraid of touching upon the core facts of the visit, such as expenditures and legitimacy. But the court laid out "the facts" before the media, refuting all allegations. But, is the court really innocent?

First, the statement is based on the investigation of the discipline department of the court and, obviously a subordinate department doesn't have the real power to monitor its leaders. Hence its findings are not convincing at all.

Second, although the court said that the visit was approved and legitimate, it didn't explain why they spent more time at tourist sports than at meetings. For example, during the 12-day trip, the officials dropped by only three courts and met one association of lawyers, which took them just about two full days. How did they spend the remaining 10 days?

The court said that each of the officials spent 80,000 yuan during the trip, adding that the expenditure didn't exceed the budget. But as far as we know, the market price for the same tour is around 20,000 yuan per person. If four times of the market price still doesn't exceed the budget, the court is really rich.

If the Guangzhou marine affair court can get away with no punishment for this overseas visit, it would set a bad example for other government departments.

The superior government department should intervene to debunk the court's statement.

(China Daily June 15, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Senior police official removed for serious discipline violation
- Guangdong official investigated over serious discipline violation
- China's anti-graft chief to visit four nations
- Crackdown on graft gets tough

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲首页在线观看| 国产专区在线播放| 99久久免费国产精精品| 成人午夜兔费观看网站| 久久亚洲国产精品五月天| 最近中文字幕大全免费版在线| 亚洲欧美在线视频| 狠狠久久精品中文字幕无码| 国产91精品在线| 被黑化男配做到哭h| 国产成人精品午夜福利| 男女抽搐动态图| 国产美女久久久久| 99热精品在线免费观看| 女大学生沙龙室3| 一本色道无码道dvd在线观看| 无遮挡又黄又爽又色的动态图1000 | 清超市欲目录大团结| 免费在线观看你懂的| 精品国产乱码一区二区三区| 国产AV人人夜夜澡人人爽麻豆 | 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交蜜桃 | 色人阁在线视频| 国产精品亚洲四区在线观看| 91丁香亚洲综合社区| 国内精品视频一区二区三区八戒 | 久久婷婷香蕉热狠狠综合| 最刺激黄a大片免费网站| 亚洲不卡av不卡一区二区| 欧美成人精品第一区二区三区 | 波多野给衣一区二区三区| 伦理片中文字幕完整视频| 粗暴hd另类另类| 免费看又爽又黄禁片视频1000| 精品国产麻豆免费人成网站| 四虎8848精品永久在线观看| 色天天天综合色天天碰| 国产乱码一区二区三区爽爽爽 | 精品亚洲成a人无码成a在线观看| 啊灬啊别停灬用力视频啊视频| 色噜噜噜噜亚洲第一|