Facing facts about the euro experiment

By Joseph E. Stiglitz
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Shanghai Daily, May 7, 2010
Adjust font size:

At the euro's creation, many worried about its long-run viability. When everything went well, these worries were forgotten. But the question of how adjustments would be made if part of the eurozone were hit by a strong adverse shock lingered.

Fixing the exchange rate and delegating monetary policy to the European Central Bank eliminated two primary means by which national governments stimulate their economies to avoid recession.

What could replace them?

The Nobel Laureate Robert Mundell laid out the conditions under which a single currency could work. Europe didn't meet those conditions at the time; it still doesn't. The removal of legal barriers to the movement of workers created a single labor market, but linguistic and cultural differences make American-style labor mobility unachievable.

Moreover, Europe has no way of helping those countries facing severe problems. Consider Spain, which has an unemployment rate of 20 percent. It had a fiscal surplus before the crisis; after the crisis, its deficit increased to more than 11 percent of GDP. But, under European Union rules, Spain must now cut its spending, which will likely exacerbate unemployment.

Some hoped that the Greek tragedy would convince policy makers that the euro cannot succeed without greater cooperation (including fiscal assistance).

But Germany, partly following popular opinion, has opposed giving Greece the help that it needs. To many, both in and outside of Greece, this stance was peculiar: billions had been spent saving big banks, but evidently saving a country of 11 million people was taboo. It was not even clear that the help Greece needed should be labeled a bailout: while the funds given to financial institutions like AIG were unlikely to be recouped, a loan to Greece at a reasonable interest rate would likely be repaid.

A series of half-offers and vague promises, intended to calm the market, failed. Just as the United States had cobbled together assistance for Mexico 15 years ago by combining help from the International Monetary Fund and the G7, so, too, the EU put together an assistance program with the IMF.

The question was, what conditions would be imposed on Greece? How big would be the adverse impact?

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天综合网久久| 日本人与黑人videos系列| 免费人成再在线观看网站| 中文乱码人妻系列一区二区| 最好看的最新中文字幕2018免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩精品专区| 野花影院在线直播视频| 国产男人午夜视频在线观看| 两个人看的日本高清电影| 欧美亚洲另类在线| 午夜a成v人电影| 国色天香网在线| 国产精品成年片在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品久久| 天天想你视频免费观看完整版高清中文 | 亚洲精品456| 用我的手指搅乱吧未增删翻译| 全球中文成人在线| 精品无码三级在线观看视频| 国产片免费在线观看| 2022男人天堂| 国产肉丝袜在线观看| 99久久国产综合精品1尤物| 天堂资源bt在线官网| 久久99热国产这有精品| 亚洲成色www久久网站| 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲| 国产91成人精品亚洲精品| 中文字幕你懂的| 国产精品嫩草影院在线播放| 6080新视觉| 国产精品成在线观看| 91精品国产免费久久久久久青草 | 一本大道一卡2卡三卡4卡麻豆| 暴力肉体进入hdxxxxx| 亚洲乱码中文论理电影| 欧美性猛交xxxx免费看手交| 亚洲成色www久久网站| 欧美日韩一区二区综合| 免费一级毛片在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久中文字幕|