What lies behind anti-China rhetoric in Congress?

By John Ross
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, September 27, 2010
Adjust font size:

But there is a more deep seated reason. Sometime this century, the U.S. will drop from being the largest economy in the world to being the third largest – after China and India. The shift is inevitable – dictated by economics and simple arithmetic. China and India both have four times the population of the U.S. When their per capita GDP reaches more than one quarter that of the U.S., their economies will overtake the U.S.

Anyone in the U.S. trying to prevent this is attempting the impossible. To demand the US remains the world's largest economy is to demand the average person in India or China never enjoys even a quarter of average US living standards. It requires no skill to guess the outcome if this proposition were put to the vote in China or India.

For ordinary Americans what matters is their income, not the absolute size of US GDP. In real terms, several countries, for example Norway and Singapore, already have higher per capita GDPs than the U.S. Even on the most optimistic assumptions, China won't catch up with US living standards until the second half of the century and India will get there even later. But when it happens, both China and India will have economies four times the size of the U.S., and the world will look a totally different place. Everyone, incidentally, will be a lot more prosperous than they are today.

Unfortunately, US neo-conservatives think in terms of power politics not living standards. They are determined that the U.S. will continue to have the largest economy in the world, even if this means people in China and India have their living standards restricted. Since people with such primitive political ideas have no policies to speed up US economic growth, they turn instead to thinking about how to slow down China, regardless of the consequences for the living standards of its people.

Given this interpretation, the manoeuvres in Congress make perfect sense. Tariffs against China will not create US jobs but they will do some, although fortunately not serious, damage to China. (Almost 80 percent of China's exports now go to countries other than the U.S.)

When judging policies we need to ask "cui bono" - who benefits? American workers will not benefit from tariffs against China. Neither will the Chinese population. Only US neo-cons, with their vain hopes of preventing India and China overtaking the U.S., stand to gain.

China's leaders have so far responded to the foolish Congressional attacks with wisdom, firmness and restraint. It is in the interest of everyone that they continue to do so.

The people of China and India have exactly the same right to a high standard of living as the American people – no more and no less. Moves in the US Congress are not the first, and regrettably they will not be the last, distasteful attempt to prevent them achieving it. Apply the test of "who benefits" and it becomes clear why arguments that lack all economic logic are being put forward in Congress.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/node_7080931.htm

 

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 老子影院午夜伦手机不卡6080| 在线看片你懂的| 美国式禁忌矿桥矿网第11集| 国产成人免费观看| 2022天天躁夜夜躁西| 大陆老太交xxxxxhd在线| 一级毛片完整版| 欧洲美熟女乱又伦免费视频| 亚洲精品亚洲人成在线| 精东传媒国产app| 另类国产ts人妖合集| 蜜芽忘忧草二区老狼果冻传媒 | 午夜视频久久久久一区| 天堂中文www资源在线| 国偷自产视频一区二区久| 久久久久久久久影院| 日韩精品第1页| 伊人一伊人色综合网| 音影先锋在线资源| 国产无套粉嫩白浆| 99精品久久久中文字幕| 好男人www.| 一区二区三区91| 少妇性俱乐部纵欲狂欢少妇| 中国老头和老头gay视频ha| 日日夜夜天天久久| 久久久综合九色合综国产精品| 日韩大片高清播放器好| 久久综合香蕉国产蜜臀AV| 最近中文字幕国语免费完整| 亚洲一区爱区精品无码| 男人边摸边吃奶边做下面| 制服丝袜人妻中文字幕在线| 美国式的禁忌80版| 另类图片亚洲校园小说区| 精品综合久久久久久8888| 国产成人综合在线视频| 婷婷六月丁香午夜爱爱| 国产精品亚欧美一区二区三区| 在线观看xxx| 国产精品密蕾丝视频|