BRIC a convenient illusion, not a lasting alliance

By Oliver Stuenkel
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 16, 2010
Adjust font size:

 

The BRICs were different. Since O'Neill only looked at economics and never intended to devise a political alliance when he created the term, the countries he chose were very heterogeneous. Brazil and India are two democracies that are not yet fully established in today's order, while China and Russia have been established powers since 1945.

The four disagree on virtually everything, including trade, climate change, human rights, and the reform of global governance.

Despite all this, the BRICs turned into a household term among international policy- makers. Their leaders begun to refer to themselves as "BRIC members" and agreed that they needed to strengthen "intra-BRIC" ties.

In 2009 President Lula, President Medvedev, Prime Minister Singh and President Hu Jintao met for a BRIC summit in St. Petersburg. A second BRIC summit followed in April 2010 in Brasília.

Yet after initial optimism during negotiations and grand announcements about a "new world order," the BRIC members realized that their positions were too far apart to agree on any specific measures.

The BRICs' discontent with the system and claim for a greater say, their revisionist rhetoric, the vagueness about what should be changed and their eventually reluctant acknowledgement that the system is fundamentally sound showed that reality is more complicated than fiction, and that O'Neill's category is too broad to be meaningful.

What the success of the BRIC label really showed was that scholars and investors are not the only ones who search for a category that can capture reality. Heads of state long for a meaningful way to understand the world as well. The four leaders essentially met in St. Petersburg to try on the category O'Neill had devised for them.

Rather than pointing to their similarities, their behavior reflected their strong desire to comprehend which category they themselves belong to.

In a rapidly changing world were the traditional parameters of East vs. West, North vs. South and rich vs. poor no longer provide any guidance for rising powers, trying on the "BRIC hat" was merely another episode, yet certainly not the last, in their complex search for their identity and place in a world they will soon rule.

The author is a visiting professor of International Relations at the University of S?o Paulo. He writes about emerging powers at www.postwesternworld.com. viewpoint@globaltimes.com.cn

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 美女黄网站人色视频免费国产| 色多多视频在线观看| 日本边添边摸边做边爱的视频| 亚洲欧美日韩精品| 窝窝午夜色视频国产精品东北| 国产一级不卡毛片| 成人羞羞视频网站| 国产精品人成在线观看| 99国产精品国产精品九九| 婷婷五月综合色中文字幕| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 日韩不卡手机视频在线观看 | 亚洲色偷偷色噜噜狠狠99网| 精品国产av一区二区三区| 国产a级毛片久久久精品毛片| 韩国理论片久久电影网| 国产毛片哪里有| 两个人看的视频高清在线www | 久久超碰97人人做人人爱| 欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区| 亚洲桃色av无码| 毛片免费在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽精品欧美| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区| 国产xxxx色视频在线观看| 视频在线观看一区| 国产内射999视频一区| 黑人巨茎大战欧美白妇免费| 国产最爽的乱淫视频国语对| 日本亚州视频在线八a| 国产精品va一区二区三区| 18禁无遮挡无码国产免费网站 | 五月婷婷狠狠干| 欧美va亚洲va在线观看| 亚洲免费小视频| 欧美人禽猛交乱配| 亚洲国产欧美国产综合一区| 欧美日韩国产另类一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩精品专区| 欧美浓毛大泬视频| 亚洲日韩欧美一区久久久久我|