Hydropower remains cleanest solution to rural regions

By Zhang Boting
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, February 18, 2011
Adjust font size:

[By Liu Rui/Global Times]



Recently an official at the Ministry of Environment Protection claimed that hydroelectric stations might be more environmentally damaging than conventional thermal power stations.

This reflects a narrow and biased view.

At present the governmental regulations on reducing pollution only examines sulfur dioxide and chemical oxygen demand (COD), a measurement of organic pollutant. It is believed that the building of dams would slow down water flow, exacerbate COD data and cause algae bloom.

But it's not true that slowing the water flow would definitely threaten the water environment. For one thing, it would be much easier for suspended solids to be deposited through sedimentation. For another, slowing the water flow would be much more environmentally sensitive. Industrial pollution would result in much more serious hazards than before. This would force local governments to harshly eliminate those small polluting businesses and build more sewage treatment plants.

As for other ecological concerns, the amount of fish has been continuously declining regardless of dam construction.

Changes in waterways may exert a short-term impact but in long run fish can adapt to the new environment. Overfishing and pollution cause much more damage to marine life than dams.

Dams and reservoirs are actually reducing the risk of geological catastrophes. By slowing down the water flow, rocks along rivers would be less corroded and landslide would also become less likely.

Some fanatic environmentalists misled the public and pressed for irrational policies. Fortunately their techniques don't always prevail. Now policymaking increasingly respects scientific analysis rather than media hype and environmentalists' emotions. Nevertheless, some stubborn environmental fundamentalists, still can influence the public understanding.

Their persistence is explained by how Chinese environmentalist groups work. Most environmentalists receive funding from NGOs, and in return they must present convincing reports about how bad the environment is and how courageously they are fighting against the polluting tycoons.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 97色在线观看| 久久久91精品国产一区二区三区| 污视频免费看网站| 午夜一区二区三区| 草草影院国产第一页| 国产成人av在线免播放观看| 18女人腿打开无遮挡网站| 在线中文字幕网| gogo全球高清大胆啪啪| 成人国产一区二区三区| 久久久久噜噜噜亚洲熟女综合| 日韩视频中文字幕| 亚洲av本道一区二区三区四区| 欧美激情精品久久久久久久九九九| 国模精品视频一区二区三区| 一区二区三区视频| 探花国产精品三级在线播放| 亚洲天堂水蜜桃| 永久免费视频v片www| 人人妻人人爽人人澡欧美一区| 精品一区二区三区自拍图片区| 卡一卡二卡三在线入口免费| 色播在线观看免费| 国产传媒在线观看| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 夫妇交换性3中文字幕| 一本色道久久综合网| 成年在线网站免费观看无广告| 亚洲专区第一页| 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线观看视频| 亚洲高清无在码在线电影不卡| 男生吃女生的jiojio| 免费的一级毛片| 白白国产永久免费视频| 免费精品国产日韩热久久| 精品国产v无码大片在线看| 午夜精品久久久久久久久| 绿巨人草莓香蕉丝瓜菠萝| 四虎e234hcom| 美女的尿口免费| 又硬又粗又大一区二区三区视频|