Debate: Income tax

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, February 28, 2011
Adjust font size:

Premier Wen Jiabao on Sunday said the government planned to discuss raising the income tax threshold to benefit people with low incomes. A media commentator says raising the threshold will benefit the poor people, but two scholars say we can't count on the tax threshold alone.

Ye Tan: Raise cutoff point, help the poor

It is necessary to reform the individual income tax system to ensure fairness and make it socially more relevant. Besides, raising the tax threshold is a good way of returning national wealth to the people.

Salary earners are the country's major taxpaying group, and denuding them of their hard-earned money is akin to draining a pond to catch the fish.

The individual income tax threshold (or cutoff point) is 2,000 yuan ($304), that is, people earning 2,000 yuan or less a month do not pay income tax. Data from the National Bureau of Statistics shows that in 2009, the average monthly pay of private company workers in Chinese cities and towns was 1,500 yuan a month, while those working in the public sector earned an average of 2,728 yuan. Rural residents are exempt from paying any personal income tax.

The individual income tax cutoff point was raised from 1,600 yuan to 2,000 yuan in 2008, which the government says exempted many people from paying the tax. But in the past three years, the purchasing power of money has declined thanks to inflation and rising housing prices. The purchasing power of 2,000 yuan in 2011 may be even less than that of 1,600 yuan in 2007, which again calls for a higher threshold.

Raising the individual income tax cutoff point does not mean the government has to adopt a Robin Hood-like policy. It is estimated that if the cutoff point is raised to 3,000 yuan, the tax burden of people earning a monthly salary of 3,000 yuan, 5,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan will reduce by 100 percent, 46.15 percent and 16.33 percent. So raising the tax threshold is not taking money from the rich to give it to the poor. Instead, it is providing relief to low- and middle-income groups without allowing the rich hitch a ride on the back of their lower-earning people.

Official statistics show that low- and middle-income households account for the largest part of taxpayers. Nearly two-thirds of the individual income tax revenue comes from the low- and middle-income people who earn more than 2,000 yuan a month. In other words, if the tax threshold were raised, the government would lose tens of billions of yuan in tax revenue. Though this may be true, it hides a bitter truth.

Let us do the math first and then dig out the bitter truth. In 2008, the country's individual income tax revenue was 372.2 billion yuan, with taxpayers with an annual income of less than 120,000 yuan contributing the lion's share of 242.8 billion yuan. And what did those earning more than 120,000 yuan a year pay? Just a little more than half that amount, that is, 129.4 billion yuan. If the threshold were raised to 3,000 yuan or 5,000 yuan, the nation's individual income tax revenue will fall by about 120 billion yuan or 190 billion yuan.

If the income tax cutoff point is raised, the tax and finance authorities may have to impose higher taxes on the rich to offset the shortfall to be created by the exemption granted to some middle-income earners. But this will help social harmony.

Whether the authorities will substantially raise the tax threshold is unknown. The government is reported to plan to simplify the tax rates, too. At present, there are nine individual income tax brackets and the tax rates start from 5 percent and rising up to 45 percent. The government's adjustment exercise is aimed at reducing the tax levels to five or six, and simplifying the tax rates.

The purpose of imposing income tax is to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor and help better distribute national wealth among the public. To achieve this, the rich should be made to pay higher income tax as well as tax on earnings from all other sources.

China's annual revenue from individual income tax in 2009 was 394.9 billion yuan, accounting for less than 7 percent of the country's overall income. So, individual income tax reform, even if it reduces the government's income tax revenue, will not cause turbulence.

Individual income tax should be a tool to adjust income distribution and middle-income group should not remain the main taxpaying group. There is great growth potential for individual income, which plays an important role in supporting central and local governments.

But leaving the individual income tax threshold intact will be deviating from the original intention of helping the middle- and low-income groups.

It is high time that the tax system was reformed comprehensively and the individual income tax threshold was raised. This will let people enjoy more benefits from China's economic development and eventually help maintain social harmony.

The author is a commentator on finance and economics.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久9这里精品免费视频| 国产精品99re| 久久久久无码精品国产不卡| 欧美大黑帍在线播放| 国产一级一级片| 国产成人福利免费视频| 少妇人妻偷人精品视蜜桃| 久久免费视频3| 特黄特色大片免费播放| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 2021国内精品久久久久久影院| 女人是男人的未来1分29分 | 国产欧美日韩视频在线观看一区二区 | 一级毛片一级毛片免费毛片| 欧洲熟妇色xxxx欧美老妇多毛| 亚洲电影中文字幕| 老师你的兔子好软水好多的车视频| 国产精品国产三级国产AV′| 99热这里只有精品6免费| 日本不卡一区二区三区最新| 五十路在线观看| 波多野结衣被躁| 免费看污污的网站| 精品欧美一区二区精品久久| 国产999视频| 亚洲国产成人精品激情| 好吊色青青青国产在线观看| 久久福利资源网站免费看| 波多野结衣痴汉| 伊甸园在线观看国产| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ麻豆 | 中文字幕精品视频| 最近的中文字幕视频完整| 免费一级特黄特色大片在线| 青柠直播在线观看高清播放| 国产美女久久久| 99精品国产一区二区三区2021| 夫妇交换性3中文字幕| 久久久久久亚洲精品无码| 欧美成视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕专区|