Shall we all be Charlie: a US-Europe comparison

By Shen Dingli
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 4, 2015
Adjust font size:

This said, even "disrespect" of one's own values should not be responded with radical means including violence. That is why globally France has been sympathized with. Nevertheless, such comfort has to be properly received as it contains the message of tolerance. To the surprise of many, the Charlie Hebdo reprinted that issue which evoked the terrorist attack, and published a new issue that portraits the Prophet again. Legally this has violated no restriction, but culturally the French cartoon magazine, with many supporters behind it, contrasts a lot with the political code that many Americans have followed.

The aforementioned difference between American and European response to the Charlie Hebdo illustrates the boundary of freedom – the liberty of media may not go without a limit. At political level, the fundamental value of democracy lies in the essential assumption of mutual respect, as any minority or ethnic group has a right to express. But in terms of social and economic impact, any such expression has to be weighed against cost. An unchecked freedom could likely lead to social unrest, so one has to balance rights and obligation.

Such common sense actually applies widely. Many countries have adopted media censorship on certain substances such as anti-society, extremism, or pornography. But on culturally sensitive area, it is more up to an individual to allow self-censorship and the government needs to encourage proper balance of tolerance and freedom. A mature society has to be able to get the best of them, rather than to be harmed by unlimited liberty and unbalanced tolerance.

Thus, to be a responsible Charlie might be more important than to be a mere Charlie, which stresses an abstract concept of freedom. Appreciating the right of liberty, while being sensible of other's culture, brings more benefit but less harm than otherwise. The truth is neither "We are all Charlie", nor "We are not Charlie", but "We are not all Charlie".

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/shendingli.htm

This article was first published at Chinausfocus.com To see the original version please visit http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/shall-we-all-be-charlie-a-u-s-europe-comparison/

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美国产在线看| 精品国产成a人在线观看| 李莫愁好紧好湿好滑| 人人妻人人添人人爽日韩欧美| 麻豆国产一区二区在线观看| 成人免费看www网址入口| 久久成人福利视频| 欧美乱妇高清无乱码免费| 亚洲精品白色在线发布| 视频二区调教中字知名国产| 国产激情视频在线播放| 一二三四在线视频社区8| 欧美zoozzooz在线观看| 亚洲第一永久色| 狼友av永久网站免费观看| 公用玩物(np双xing总受)by单唯安| 老师好紧开裆蕾丝内裤小说| 国产精品热久久无码AV| 99热在线观看| 女同性之间同床互摸视频| 亚洲AV无码AV制服另类专区| 欧美日韩视频一区三区二区| 向日葵app下载视频免费| 足鞋臭脚袜奴交小说h| 国产在线精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲校园春色另类激情| 嫩草香味在线观看6080| 亚洲av无码片在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区| 向日葵视频app免费下载| 色欲AV无码一区二区三区| 国产亚洲漂亮白嫩美女在线| 麻豆国产AV丝袜白领传媒| 国内揄拍国内精品视频| a级国产精品片在线观看| 女人扒开尿口给男人捅| www.jizz在线观看| 好黄好猛好爽好痛的视频| 一级毛片美国一级j毛片不卡| 成人精品一区二区激情| 亚洲a∨无码精品色午夜|