China's 'Belt and Road' initiative and the EU's 'Juncker Plan'

By John Ross
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, January 16, 2016
Adjust font size:

The overlap of the Juncker Plan's ideas with China's Belt and Road initiative is evident. China's new distinctive idea in the initiative, as with parallel ones such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), is explicitly tying together trade and infrastructure investment initiatives.

Previous post-World War II trade initiatives up to the creation of the World Trade Organisation, all led by the U.S., focused on tariff and legal changes. Adding infrastructure investment and financing necessary to create it as a central element was China's innovation - an example of "thought leadership."

The first success illustrating the power of China's new form of economic initiative was the U.K.'s decision, followed by other major European countries including Germany, to join the AIIB despite U.S. objections. The convergence of the Juncker Plan with the Belt and Road initiative is an example of the same process involving an even greater number of European countries.

At first sight it might appear strange that the idea of closely linking trade and infrastructure investment was not put forward earlier by Western leaders. The beneficial economic effect of both trade and investment, and the correlation of the two, is well established in economics. The classic "Western" study of the advantages of "openness" in trade, by Sachs and Warner, found: "Open economies had significantly higher investment-to-GDP ratios, and that [an open economy] raised the investment ratio by an average of 5.4 percentage points." Therefore why was it China that first explicitly linked these in a coherent new international policy?

Practically China learnt from the advantages of its domestic economic structure compared to the West. The Western private sector economies are dominated by a mantra "private is good, state is bad." Therefore proposals for inevitably state led infrastructure investment by Summers, Wolf etc., encountered fierce ideological opposition - as well as few strong structures existing to implement the policy.

In China in contrast, as restated by the 3rd plenum of the 18th CPC Central Committee: "We must unswervingly… give full play to the leading role of the state-owned sector." In China's economy both a private and state sector exist and the state can therefore play a key role in initiatives such as infrastructure investment.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 草草影院www色欧美极品| 91女神疯狂娇喘3p之夜| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲国产精品综合一区在线| a毛片成人免费全部播放| 手机在线看片你懂得| 双女车车好快的车车有点污| 高清欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品jizz在线观看直播| 91欧美在线视频| 大佬和我的365天2在线观看| 一二三四国语在线观看视频| 最近的中文字幕视频完整| 亚洲欧美专区精品久久| 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜视频麻豆| 免费视频专区一国产盗摄| 美女双腿打开让男人桶爽网站| 国产乱来乱子视频| 香蕉视频黄色在线观看| 国产日产欧美精品| bl文库双性灌尿| 婷婷丁香五月中文字幕| 三级韩国一区久久二区综合| 报告夫人漫画画免费读漫画在线观看漫画ag | 天天天天躁天天爱天天碰2018 | 国产精品亚洲专区无码不卡| 91av视频网站| 国产黄大片在线观| 99久久一香蕉国产线看观看| 天天摸日日摸人人看| 久久国产精品二国产精品| 机机对机机120分免费无遮挡| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉啊| 欧美性色19p| 亚洲成a人片在线看| 欧美日韩黄色大片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 亚洲欧美日韩色| 欧美激情综合色综合啪啪五月| 亚洲精品15p|