A policy of open scientific data sharing benefits all

By Richard de Grijs
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, July 30, 2017
Adjust font size:

China’s first X-ray space telescope [File photo]



The other day, reading a headline in the China Daily, “Data of China’s first X-ray space telescope to be open to global scientists,” I was both surprised and somewhat concerned.

Surprised, because it is international best practice in science to share data with anyone, no matter what their institutional affiliation, nationality or geographical location. I had therefore expected no less than an open and transparent data policy from the team running the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HXMT), nicknamed Insight.

Concerned, because the headline implied that scientific policy makers apparently thought such openness was novel. It is not; open data sharing has been the international norm in the field of space science since the first scientific missions supported by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).

Of course, commercial and national security interests can preclude some open data-sharing, but an X-ray satellite designed to explore distant celestial objects to better understand their nature – including that of the massive “black holes” at the centers of many nearby galaxies – hardly pose a threat to national security.

This policy of openness – both in terms of data availability and data acquisition – has been enormously beneficial to both NASA and ESA. Their joint project, the Hubble Space Telescope, is arguably the most productive scientific instrument ever built.

Its productivity is due largely to the way it offers unrestricted access to anyone with a great idea – the competition is fierce, with “oversubscription rates” by factors of eight or more; however, if your idea is ground-breaking, it doesn’t matter where you are based.

The students and junior researchers in my team at Peking University routinely use Hubble observations that have languished in its Data Archive for years, perhaps never explored or used for other purposes.

The age of observational data in astrophysics doesn’t matter; the novelty of the results does – and by using years-old Hubble data, we have managed to publish a number of ground-breaking discoveries in prestigious journals like Nature.

Of course, we get the academic credit for those discoveries, but both space agencies also get what they hoped for: more publicity and a confirmation of their cutting-edge status.

Such are indeed the prospects for the X-ray observations the Insight module will obtain as well. No matter who publishes their scientific results, the eventual kudos go to the Chinese team responsible for the satellite’s development and operation.

By international norms, the scientists involved understand their data, as well as that obtained for any other scientist whose proposal is accepted, will be theirs for just a year, the ‘proprietary’ period.

For so-called “survey” facilities, like ESA’s current flagship mission Gaia (which will revolutionize studies and understanding of our own Milky Way galaxy), the timeline is somewhat different. Their data will still be made publicly available, but through annual data releases; the first Gaia release happened just recently.

So, my concern when reading the newspaper headline was that it might indicate an underlying reluctance by the scientific policymakers responsible for Chinese space missions to truly embrace a spirit of international openness. This would send a poor message about the scientific community on which I consider myself an integral and active member.

Fortunately, upon reading the full article, I was reassured that Chinese space scientists indeed want to contribute their novel achievements in high technology to the international community.

Perhaps it was just the headline writer who didn’t quite understand the potentially negative implication of his words. By joining forces with the greatest minds, scientific progress becomes ever more promising.

Richard de Grijs is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/RicharddeGrijs.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美成人精品福利在线视频| 国产chinese91在线| 亚洲精品字幕在线观看| 两个人一上一下剧烈运动| 欧美重口另类在线播放二区| 国产午夜鲁丝片av无码免费| spoz是什么意思医学| 柔佳呻吟乳峰喘息高耸入云| 午夜理论影院第九电影院| 19日本人xxxxwww| 成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区第四页| 花季app色版网站免费| 国产麻豆精品一区二区三区V视界| 久久夜色精品国产噜噜麻豆| 波多野结衣免费在线观看| 国产线视频精品免费观看视频| 中文字幕色网站| 欧美成人免费一级人片| 亚洲视频一区二区在线观看| 久久亚洲AV成人无码| 特级欧美老少乱配| 国产人人为我我为人| 97精品伊人久久久大香线蕉| 无码av专区丝袜专区| 亚洲小说图片区| 精品国产一区二区三区av片| 国产精品videossex国产高清 | 亚洲a∨精品一区二区三区下载| 精品极品三级久久久久| 国产日韩欧美中文字幕| 99视频在线精品免费| 无码人妻av一区二区三区蜜臀| 久久嫩草影院免费看夜色| 欧美精品久久一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲乱码伦小说区69堂| 黄色片网站在线免费观看| 国美女福利视频午夜精品| 中文字幕在线播放| 最近免费中文字幕大全高清10| 人人妻人人澡av天堂香蕉 |