America struggles to stop a rash of mass shootings

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, August 20, 2019
Adjust font size:
A college student takes part in a rally for gun control and anti-racism, in El Paso, Texas, the United States, Aug. 7, 2019. [Photo/Xinhua]

As the American politicians and experts were arguing yet again about how to put a lid on rampant gun violence, another shooting incident – in Philadelphia – further frayed public nerves. 

Luckily there wasn't any fatality; the injuries sustained by the six police officers were not life-threatening. The officers were trying to serve a drugs arrest warrant when the gunman started firing, resulting in a seven-hour stand-off before police managed to subdue the suspect, a white male. 

The Philadelphia shooting came on the heels of two deadly incidents of gun violence – in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio – killing more than 30 innocent people.

Faced with a seemingly endless series of mass shootings, the public are left wondering who to look to for succor. Nobody can provide a convincing answer why gun-wielding maniacs are left free to kill people at will. 

The three incidents detailed above once again spotlight the issue of gun control. 

As usual, American society is being torn apart by those determinedly supporting the constitutional right to bear arms and those opposing this idea and demanding some reasonable laws to try and keep guns out of the hands of fanatical killers. 

The pro-gun lobby base their stand on the Second Amendment to the U.S. constitution. "A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed," reads that succinct piece of legislation ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. 

A lot has been said and written about the objectives of the framers of the amendment in the crucial early years of the United States of America. The Supreme Court has also been called upon to deliver several rulings trying to interpret it.

Without going into that convoluted debate, a common view is that the amendment allows people to have weapons for self-defense or to use them for the defense of the state if needed. 

Common sense dictates that the amendment in no way provides any kind of justification to use the lethal weapons for mowing down people as we generally see in movies.  

Those who want to see an end to the gun violence do not necessarily ask for the entire amendment to be scrapped. Rather, the demand is that reasonable advance security checks should be a prerequisite for anyone being allowed to buy a gun. 

The powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), a gun rights advocacy group considered the main hurdle to any legislation, boasts millions of members, along with powerful links with politicians and industry. 

However, the law also prohibits using violence against unarmed people. So, why do elements within the NRA insisting on their gun rights ignore the rights to life and personal safety, also constitutionally guaranteed? 

However, the issue goes far beyond that argument. 

On the other side of the debate, we have the argument that guns per se don't kill. They are like any other weapons – a sword, a knife or an axe – that only become potentially lethal when wielded by individuals. 

We have seen many stabbing incidents around the world in recent times; people are been killed by simple weapons like a club. In older times, swords were considered as quite handy to target enemies. 

So, the problem is not just the automatic weapons, but must also focus on the ones holding them and pulling the trigger. As Americans debate curbs on buying guns and periodic checks on those possessing weapons, there is an urgent need to address the issue of mental health. 

On a wider level, the issue of culture of violence needs attention. We need to discourage behavior and actions that glorifies death and destruction. 

After the El Paso and Dayton shootings, President Donald Trump talked about reasonable checks to control guns. Any step towards it should be appreciated. 

But laws don't operate in isolation. Unless the American people and their elected representatives change their approach towards violence, they may have to witness more scenes of random mass shootings.  

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.


If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人国产精品免费视频| 欧美午夜在线视频| 国产av激情无码久久| 日本丰满www色| 国产色a在线观看| 一本一道久久综合久久| 无码丰满熟妇一区二区| 久热这里只有精品视频6| 欧美换爱交换乱理伦片不卡片| 人妻人人澡人人添人人爽人人玩| 精品国产精品国产| 国产一区精品视频| 香蕉久久人人爽人人爽人人片av| 国产福利一区二区三区在线观看| 91av在线电影| 在线成人a毛片免费播放| videofree极品另类| 成人一级片在线观看| 久久18禁高潮出水呻吟娇喘| 日韩在线视频观看| 亚州日本乱码一区二区三区| 欧美人七十二式性视频教程一| 亚洲日韩一页精品发布| 污污的视频在线免费观看| 太粗太长岳受不了了| 中文字幕精品一区二区| 日本工口里番h彩色无遮挡全彩 | 男女污污视频在线观看| 北岛玲在线一区二区| 美女的胸又黄又www网站免费| 国产精品久久福利网站| 91av视频免费在线观看| 国产资源在线看| 91av电影在线观看| 国产高清一级片| 91欧美激情一区二区三区成人| 在线观免费看高清影视剧| 99国产情在线视频| 在线免费观看一级毛片| 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃 |