Who will gain most politically from the crisis?

By Robert Griffiths
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 12, 2022
Adjust font size:
Smoke rises in the sky above Kyiv, Ukraine, on Feb. 27, 2022. [Photo/Xinhua]

In Britain, who will gain the most politically from the Ukraine crisis?

Public sympathy for the plight of the Ukrainian people is widespread.

People also want to see Boris Johnson's government remove the barriers that prevent many more Ukrainian refugees from entering Britain. Many thousands of families have declared their readiness to provide accommodation to them.

However, perhaps surprisingly, the public mood in Britain has so far had little impact on people's views of the main political parties.

The Labour Party's lead in the opinion polls has narrowed slightly since tensions on the Russia-Ukraine border hit the headlines in late January. Labour had overtaken the Conservatives toward the end of last year amid growing criticism of government double standards and corruption in relation to Covid rules and commercial contracts.

The biggest change has been in Boris Johnson's personal approval ratings. The daily death toll from the pandemic began falling as the Ukraine crisis grew, lending credibility to claims that his Covid policies were working, while the Ukraine crisis drew attention away from government incompetence.

Yet a majority of people in Britain continue to disapprove of Johnson's record as Prime Minister. His response has been to present himself as one of the leaders of a united Western struggle against Russia.

Any idea that the West, NATO, or politicians might have contributed to creating the conditions for military conflict in Ukraine has been banished from almost all television, radio, and newspaper platforms.

The Russia Television (RT) channel has been bundled off the air in Britain, although its coverage of the war was less unbalanced than that of the BBC and Sky. 

Anti-Russia Cold War passions and prejudices are being stoked by the media and politicians, leaving many people in Britain under the illusion that Russia's aim is to control much of Eastern Europe, if not the whole continent.

Anyone who criticizes or even questions the relentless eastern expansion of NATO, or who suggests that some of Russia's security concerns may be legitimate, is likely to be labeled a Kremlin apologist.

Communists and other campaigners calling for a ceasefire and peace negotiations have been abused and physically attacked as Moscow stooges.

Even before the Ukraine crisis began, leader of the Labour Party Keir Starmer attacked the Stop the War coalition for "showing solidarity with the aggressor." He threatened to eject 11 MPs from the Parliamentary Labour Party unless they withdrew their signatures from Stop the War's statement on the outbreak of the Ukrainian crisis on Feb. 24.

In truth, Stop the War's real offence was to condemn the expansion of NATO and U.S. and British "wars of aggression" over the past three decades. Starmer's view is that the foundation of NATO was the greatest achievement on the world stage of the 1945-51 Labour government. He is the first Labour leader since then to rule that criticism of NATO is, in effect, incompatible with being a Labour MP.

It's possible that wrapping himself in the NATO flag will maintain Starmer and Labour's lead in the opinion polls. But he will need much more than this to overturn the Conservative Party's overall majority of 77 seats at Westminster in Britain's next General Election, scheduled for 2024.

As gas, electricity, petrol, public transport, and food costs far outstrip meager increases in wages, pensions, and welfare benefits, voters want to know what a Starmer-led Labour government would do about Britain's escalating "cost of living" crisis.

He's already dumped his party's popular commitment to taking gas, electricity, and the railways back into public ownership. Anything as radical as a Wealth Tax on Britain's own oligarchs, real controls on City of London money laundering, or higher corporation tax on company profits, could sink his ambition to be seen as a safe pair of hands for big business.

Robert Griffiths is a former Senior Lecturer in Political Economy and History at the University of Wales and currently the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Britain.

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors only, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交| 绿巨人app入口| 国产精品夜色一区二区三区| 全彩口工彩漫画无遮漫画| 麻豆果冻国产91在线极品| 国产精品入口在线看麻豆| 97色伦综合在线欧美视频| 巨肉黄暴辣文高h文奶汁| 中文字幕在线观看91| 日本成人在线免费| 久久综合九色综合欧美狠狠| 欧美亚洲另类在线| 亚洲国产精品毛片AV不卡在线| 波多野结衣教师未删减版| 免费一级毛片清高播放| 精品国产一区二区三区色欲| 四虎4hutv永久在线影院| 色综合天天综合| 国产亚洲人成网站在线观看| 麻豆久久婷婷综合五月国产| 国产欧美亚洲专区第一页| 丝袜诱惑中文字幕| 国产精品成久久久久三级| 777成了人乱视频| 国产黄a三级三级看三级| 99精品视频在线观看免费| 女人18片毛片60分钟| www.色噜噜| 婷婷丁香五月中文字幕| 一区二区三区视频观看| 快点使劲舒服爽视频| 中文天堂最新版www| 成人看片黄在线观看| 中文字幕一区二区三区永久| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区毛片| 久久99久久99精品免观看不卡| 日本a级视频在线播放| 久久久久亚洲AV无码网站| 日本三级在线观看免费| 久久久久香蕉视频| 日本50岁丰满熟妇xxxx|