分享縮略圖
 

WADA did not mishandle Chinese doping case, says investigator

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, July 17, 2024
Adjust font size:

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) did not show "favoritism or deference, or in any way favoured" the 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) due to food contamination in 2021, an independent prosecutor report has said.

WADA held an online extraordinary Executive meeting on Tuesday in Montreal discussing the interim report delivered by Independent Prosecutor Eric Cottier, regarding his review of WADA's handling of the China Anti-Doping Agency's (CHINADA's) no-fault contamination case involving 23 swimmers from China in 2021.

World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) President Witold Banka receives an interview from Xinhua News Agency at the Main Press Center (MPC) of Tokyo 2020 in Tokyo, Japan, July 23, 2021. (Xinhua/Luo Yuan)

In the report, Cottier concluded that WADA had been unbiased and reasonable in handling the case.

"There is nothing in the file - which is complete - to suggest that WADA showed favoritism or deference, or in any way favoured the 23 swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) between 1 and 3 January 2021, when it proceeded to review CHINADA's decision to close the proceedings against them without further action," the report said.

"The Investigator did not find any evidence to suggest any interference or meddling in WADA's review, as described above, either within the Agency or externally, from any entity or institution, including CHINADA or the Chinese authorities.

"The investigation did not reveal any irregularities on the part of WADA in the review of CHINADA's decision; this review was detailed and covered all relevant issues in determining whether or not to appeal the decision," the report concluded.

As for WADA not to appeal CHINADA's decision not to bring forward Anti-Doping Rule Violations against the 23 Chinese swimmers, the report said: "All the elements taken into consideration by WADA, whether they come from the file produced by CHINADA with its decision or from the investigation procedures that it carried out, show the decision not to appeal to be reasonable, both from the point of view of the facts and the applicable rules."

"As the report captures, WADA reviewed this case with a healthy skepticism as it does in all such cases. It was very important that we set the record straight in this regard; and, in particular regarding these two fundamental questions in advance of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games," WADA president Witold Banka said.

WADA Senior Director, Science and Medicine, Olivier Rabin, said: "In this case, despite our skepticism, a thorough review of all the verifiable facts of the case revealed no evidence to challenge the contamination scenario. Rather, all the available evidence pointed towards no-fault contamination versus intentional ingestion. Ultimately, in his report today, the Independent Prosecutor has confirmed that our conclusions were reasonable, based on the evidence."

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产大秀视频一区二区三区 | 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频 | 美女网站在线观看视频免费的| 日韩精品专区在线影院重磅| 亚洲精品国产av成拍色拍| 精品无码一区二区三区水蜜桃 | 国产福利一区二区三区| 91在线|亚洲| 天堂电影在线免费观看| 一本大道香蕉在线高清视频 | 国产午夜电影在线观看| 欧美亚洲国产第一页草草| 国产精品自在自线| 97在线公开视频| 大桥未久aⅴ一区二区| √天堂中文官网在线| 性色av无码不卡中文字幕| 中文字幕水野优香在线网在线| 日本成本人三级在线观看2018| 亚洲视频精品在线观看| 精品69久久久久久99| 和朋友共享娇妻高hh| 色吧首页dvd| 国产丝袜无码一区二区三区视频| 香蕉视频在线免费| 国产成人aaa在线视频免费观看| 日本视频网站在线www色| 国产精品一区二区av不卡| 手机在线看片你懂的| 国产精品成人扳**a毛片| 91成人午夜性a一级毛片| 国内精品在线播放| 99久久无码一区人妻| 5g年龄确认大驾光临未满| 日本一本二本免费播放视频| 久久精品免视看国产成人| 最近新免费韩国视频资源| 亚洲一级毛片免观看| 欧美一级视频免费看| 亚洲加勒比在线| 欧美一级视频在线观看|