Fifty-one out of 59 government administrations under the State Council and 70 percent of 43 selected city governments failed to pass an administrative transparency evaluation, according to a blue book report released on Thursday.
The blue book, an annual report on China's rule of law that was released by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said administrative transparency has become the government's "shortcoming" and needs "improvement".
The report reviewed the implementation of the Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information, a guideline issued by the State Council in 2007. To do so, it looked at information provided on the official websites of the administrations and city governments it was evaluating.
On the national level, the research panel chose "budget information" as the realm to assess the transparency of ministries and government administrations.
The highest score of 68 points on the centesimal system was earned by the Ministry of Science and Technology. It was followed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission and the State Forestry Administration.
The National Bureau of Corruption Prevention and the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine were at the bottom of the list, each with less than 10 points. More than 50 percent of the administrations being assessed scored between 30 and 50.
When assessing city governments, the panel used two perspectives, adding "information on food safety" as an item to be reviewed this time in addition to the "information on house demolition" subject that was also used last year.
A total of 13 local governments scored more than 60 points.
Ningbo government, in East China's Zhejiang province, topped the list with 71 points, while the government of Lanzhou, capital of Northwest China's Gansu province, was the bottom with a paltry 6 points.
Tian He, the book's executive editor-in-chief and an expert in rule of law studies with the academy, told China Daily that most governments failed to meet the requirement of the State Council's regulation because of "a lack of determination from top officials".
"In fact, if people in high positions don't care about government transparency, such requirements from the public seem useless," Tian admitted.
Asked to comment on the poor performance of the country's anti-corruption authority, Tian stressed that the index used for the evaluation was "objective".
主站蜘蛛池模板： 最强yin女系统白雪| jizzjizz丝袜老师| 精品人妻伦一二三区久久| 国产综合色在线精品| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码农村| 蜜桃视频无码区在线观看| 国产精品久久久福利| 中文字幕av无码专区第一页| 日韩一中文字幕| 亚洲麻豆精品果冻传媒| 高h全肉动漫在线观看| 女人pp被扒开流水了| 中文字幕日韩精品一区二区三区 | 87福利电影网| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁综合| 丁香狠狠色婷婷久久综合| 把胡萝卜立着自己坐上去| 久久久综合九色合综国产精品 | 国产成人综合色视频精品| 337p啪啪人体大胆| 在线观看免费黄网站| jlzzjlzz欧美大全| 日本男人操女人| 亚洲激情中文字幕| 狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕 | japanese日本护士xxxx18一19| 日韩电影免费在线观看| 亚洲免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美精品18videosex性欧美| 亚洲精品人成电影网| 老司机深夜福利影院| 国产精品久久久久一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久国产| 欧美怡红院免费全部视频| 亚洲电影在线免费观看| 激情在线小说图片视频区| 伊人影院在线播放| 狼群资源网在线视频免费观看| 国产av午夜精品一区二区入口| www成人免费视频| 日本视频免费高清一本18|