Govt grip on housing prices not optional

Global Times, March 29, 2011

Recently, many Chinese cities released their housing regulation goals but this led to a the public outcry. Some cities linked maximum house price increases to GDP growth or to the average resident disposable income.

The goals of the local regulation seemed quite different to the public's expectations. Sharp-minded critics believe that the intent was not to control house prices, but to provide new space for the price increase.

Obviously, local governments have not cooperated well with the central government. Premier Wen Jiabao recently said to China National Radio that he had confidence that house prices could "return to reasonable levels." From the released price increase control, we can clearly see hesitation, dodging and even an evasion of responsibility from local governments.

Governments at all levels should be aware that housing prices are becoming a political issue, as sensitive as CPI. Most debates about house prices are carried out at the economic level, but Chinese society simply cannot accept a fully market-based house price.

No matter whether right or wrong, Chinese society is now urging the government to solve all its economic and livelihood issues. Many people think that this is socialism.

Since the Communist Party of China holds the power, it must weather this pressure. Some requirements about housing are unreasonable. To endure them is the price of being a powerful and big government.

The housing market chaos tells us that, for a complex economy entity with 1.3 billion people, it is difficult to balance market leverages and government regulations. It can be expected that, without government regulation, house price may also drop down to a reasonable level but Chinese society does not have the patience to undergo this process. Therefore, let us leave that aside.

The regulation of house prices has become a test of the capability and credibility of the government.

The government has promised to control the prices for a long time now, but no significant effect has been seen. Doubts about local governments' profits from rising house prices have seriously hurt the credibility of the administration at all levels. This situation must be reversed.

A 10 percent or high price increase will exacerbate public doubt about local governments' willingness to control house prices. It would be irresponsible to let this doubt spread.

The governments at all levels must tell the truth. If the house prices are uncontrollable, no matter how difficult it may be, they must bravely shoulder the responsibility of their regulatory actions.

House prices concern millions of households. It is questionable whether some local governments carefully estimated the social reaction before announcing regulation goals. House pricing regulation must be accepted by the public.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产乱妇乱子在线播放视频| 欧美不卡视频一区发布| 国产午夜亚洲精品不卡电影| sss欧美一区二区三区| 日本一道本在线视频| 亚洲精品无码乱码成人| 精品国产综合区久久久久久| 国产主播一区二区三区在线观看| 国产你懂的视频| 天天5g天天爽永久免费看欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美日韩国产综合草草| 哒哒哒免费视频观看在线www| 手机看片福利在线| 少妇高潮太爽了在线观看| 久re这里只有精品最新地址| 欧美成人三级一区二区在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777| 中国精品白嫩bbwbbw| 国内精品免费麻豆网站91麻豆| xxxxx性bbbbb欧美| 日韩av高清在线看片| 亚洲av日韩综合一区久热| 欧美大香线蕉线伊人久久| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区| 男人天堂2023| 免费人成在线观看播放国产| 麻豆www传媒| 国产色无码精品视频国产| av免费不卡国产观看| 女人扒开双腿让男人捅| 久久亚洲色一区二区三区| 欧美最猛性xxxx| 刚下班坐公交车被高c怎么办| 老鸭窝视频在线观看| 国产一区在线看| 欧美日在线观看| 在线观看中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 日产精品99久久久久久| 久久只有这才是精品99|