The central government is requiring that compensation for properties reclaimed for demolition equal at least the market price to protect property owners' rights and interests and reduce related conflicts.
The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said on its website on Tuesday that work on property evaluation must be done by a qualified third-party rating institution, chosen after consultation with local residents.
The notice also required that the value of land where the property is located as well as indoor decorations and relocation settlement costs be taken into consideration for compensation.
The notice follows a regulation on home demolitions that was approved by the State Council, China's Cabinet, in January, which aimed to end forced relocations by governments.
According to the regulation, local governments are forbidden from using administrative powers to forcibly demolish residents' properties, and disputed cases shall be determined by courts.
Analysts said the latest notice was of great importance in setting fair compensation for home demolitions, which have provoked a number of high-profile incidents during forced relocations in recent years.
"The central government strived to establish fairness in a series of rules on property evaluation. It's an obvious improvement," Wang Xixin, a law professor in Peking University, told China Daily on Wednesday.
Wang is one of the five law professors who wrote an open letter to the National People's Congress, the top legislature, urging a revision of the country's demolition regulation at the end of 2009 - an event that captivated public attention.
Wang said there are still some loopholes on detailed procedures for property evaluation, which would weaken its credibility among the public.
"For instance, according to the notice, local governments will pay for the expenses on property evaluation. In this case, property owners will query the credibility of evaluation institutions when they can't get expected compensation," he said.
Also, property owners should have the right to choose institutions from across the country, instead of the current limited choices among local institutions, he added.
Li Chang'an, a public policy professor at the Beijing-based University of International Business and Economics, said whether local residents could make good use of their rights would also be a big problem in the future.
"There were always many households living on the same street. Therefore, it will be difficult to decide on an ideal institution for property evaluation as everyone has different choices," he said.
主站蜘蛛池模板: 小h片在线播放| 最近高清中文在线字幕在线观看 | 久草资源站在线| 欧美激欧美啪啪片sm| 伊人色综合久久天天| 精品日韩在线视频一区二区三区| 国产凌凌漆国语| 国产a免费观看| 国产精品久久福利网站| 91在线|欧美| 天堂中文www资源在线| 一二三四在线观看免费高清视频| 无翼乌全彩绅士知可子无遮挡 | 国产精品久久久久9999赢消| 91av电影在线观看| 在线中文字幕日韩欧美| a视频在线观看免费| 好大好硬好爽免费视频| 三级伦理电影网| 成人影片在线免费观看| 中文字幕欧美日韩在线不卡| 日本人视频jizz69页码| 久久国产美女免费观看精品| 最好看的最新中文字幕2018免费视频| 亚洲人成亚洲人成在线观看| 欧美欧美欧美欧美| 亚洲男人的天堂久久精品| 波多野结衣系列cesd819| 亚洲高清偷拍一区二区三区| 男人桶女人30分钟完整试看| 免费国产污网站在线观看| 精品69久久久久久99| 免费观看的a级毛片的网站| 精品国产日韩久久亚洲| 午夜福利一区二区三区高清视频 | 男女一边摸一边爽爽视频| 免费能直接在线观看黄的视频免费欧洲毛片**老妇女 | 一本一道av无码中文字幕| 成人au免费视频影院| 两个人看的www免费视频中文| 故意短裙公车被强好爽在线播放|