Luxury brand Hermes loses trademark lawsuit

China.org.cn, February 27, 2012

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

French luxury Group Hermes has lost its trademark lawsuit over its appeal to China's Trademark Appeal Board to cancel a trademark similar to its Chinese name, the Legal Evening News reported over the weekend.

Hermes has registered its English name and pattern in China in 1977. However, it never registered its Chinese name as a trademark.

In 1995, Guangdong-based clothing company Dafeng Garment Factory applied to the trademark board to register the trademark "愛瑪仕" for clothing products. The application later passed the board's preliminary review and was announced to the public.

Hermes appealed to the trademark board in 1997 over the trademark "愛瑪仕", saying that it's quite similar to the Chinese name of Hermes "愛馬仕". The two names share the same Chinese pinyin spelling: Ai Ma Shi.

However, the trademark board rejected Hermes' appeal and approved the Chinese company's registration in 2001.

In 2009, Hermes once again appealed to the board, saying its Chinese name enjoyed a high reputation around the world and asking the board to cancel the disputed trademark. However, Hermes' application was rejected for a second time in May last year.

Hermes claims that its Chinese name should be protected as an unregistered well-known trademark in China. It said the disputed trademark was an imitation of its Chinese name and was obtained through "deceptive means,", according to the newspaper report.

Hermes asked the court to cancel the board's ruling but the board said it had approved registration of the disputed trademark through legal procedures.

The clothing company, which was also represented, agreed with the board, the court was told.

The court said that most of the evidence presented by Hermes happened after the disputed trademark had been registered. Also, the evidence was mainly media reports about the Chinese name of Hermes in Hong Kong, which fails to prove Hermes was well-known among consumers on the Chinese mainland. Besides, Hermes also failed to provide evidence showing the disputed trademark had been acquired illegally and therefore the court ruled against the French luxury brand.

Several other international corporations are also involved in trademark disputes in China recently. Apple, producer of the iPad tablet computer, is involved in a legal dispute over the use of the iPad name on the Chinese mainland. Meanwhile, NBA legend Michael Jordan has filed a lawsuit against a Chinese sportswear producer, Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd, which has registered and used brand the same as Jordan's Chinese name.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品国三级国产AV| 一本大道一卡2卡三卡4卡麻豆| 18禁美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 日本免费网站视频www区| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕AV蜜桃| 成人浮力影院免费看| 我的3个美艳馊子白莹小说| 亚洲精品美女久久久久| 97一区二区三区四区久久| 日本黄色片免费观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品| 99精品久久99久久久久| 日本a中文字幕| 亚洲女人初试黑人巨高清| 美女的尿口免费| 国产真实露脸精彩对白| 一个人看的www在线观看免费| 最近最新中文字幕高清中文字幕网 | 国产精品第一区第27页| 中文字字幕在线精品乱码app| 欧美一级欧美三级在线观看| 免费鲁丝片一级观看| 麻豆安全免费网址入口| 国产麻豆精品手机在线观看| 东方aⅴ免费观看久久av| 极端deepthroatvideo肠交| 伊人久久大香线蕉AV一区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久郑州公司| 国产成人mv在线播放| 91精东果冻蜜桃星空麻豆| 成人无号精品一区二区三区| 久久综合九色综合欧美就去吻| 波多野结衣新婚被邻居| 双手扶在浴缸边迎合着h| 国产人与动zozo| 国内免费高清视频在线观看| a级韩国乱理论片在线观看| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区| 亚洲AV日韩精品久久久久久A | 在线麻豆国产传媒60在线观看| 中文字幕免费人成乱码中国|