Hearing ends without ruling over iPad name

China Daily, March 1, 2012

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [Chinanews.com]

A court in Guangdong province did not make a final ruling on a lengthy iPad trademark dispute between a Chinese company and tech giant Apple after a public hearing on Wednesday.

The latest hearing, held in Guangdong Provincial High People's Court, followed an initial ruling by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court, which rejected a lawsuit in December by Apple and IP Application Development accusing Proview Technology of infringing on the iPad trademark.

The hearing on Wednesday focused on whether Proview Electronics, a Taiwan-based company, had the right to represent Shenzhen-based Proview Technology to sell the iPad trademark.

Xiao Caiyuan, the attorney for Shenzhen Proview, said Shenzhen Proview and Taiwan Proview are two independent companies and the contract signed between Taiwan Proview and Apple for the iPad trademark transfer on the mainland was invalid.

Graham Michael Robinson, witness for tech company Apple, is surrounded by reporters outside the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday, as the court held a public hearing on the iPad trademark dispute. [CFP]

Graham Michael Robinson, witness for tech company Apple, is surrounded by reporters outside the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday, as the court held a public hearing on the iPad trademark dispute. [CFP]

But attorneys for Apple said Taiwan Proview was linked with Shenzhen Proview and that Apple has the right to use the iPad trademark on the mainland.

Meanwhile, senior executives from Shenzhen Proview, including Yang Rongshan, Mai Shihong and Yuan Hui, have participated in the negotiations for the trademark transfer, representing Taiwan Proview, attorneys for Apple said during the hearing.

Yang was chairman of Shenzhen Proview before he resigned in early 2010, while Mai was director of the legal affairs department with the company.

Taiwan Proview registered the iPad trademark in a number of countries and regions as early as 2000, with Shenzhen Proview registering the trademark on the mainland a year later.

Ma Xiaodong, lawyer of Proview Technology Shenzhen, is interviewed by reporters Wednesday. The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

Ma Xiaodong, lawyer of Proview Technology Shenzhen, is interviewed by reporters Wednesday. The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

At the hearing on Wednesday, representative lawyers of Apple and IP showed new evidence including e-mails between both sides during the early negotiations for the trademark deal.

However, Xiao argued Shenzhen Proview never asked its executives to negotiate with Apple and IP to sell the iPad trademark on the mainland, and Yang himself did not have the right to sell the company's properties.

Shenzhen Proview has registered and used the iPad trademark for more than a decade on the Chinese mainland, he said.

"The contract for the mainland's iPad trademark transfer was signed between Taiwan Proview and Apple and IP Application Development Limited in December of 2009, not Shenzhen Proview," Xiao said.

Apple and IP paid $56,000 to Taiwan Proview for the iPad trademark transfer.

Ma Dongxiao, a lawyer representing Shenzhen Proview, said he was confident of winning the lawsuit.

"E-mails presented by Apple at court actually have no legal validity," Ma said.

The e-mails showed that Yuan Hui, a staff member of Shenzhen Proview, was once involved in the trademark transfer negotiation.

"Yuan was actually asked by Taiwan Proview to help translate some documents during the transfer negotiation. He had no right to represent the Shenzhen side to sign the contract," Ma said.

Also, a lawyer surnamed Wang who attended the public hearing, said Shenzhen Proview has a good chance of winning, according to the evidence produced by both parties so far.

"Shenzhen Proview and Taiwan Proview are after all two different companies, and Shenzhen Proview has never signed the iPad trademark transfer contract with the foreign companies," Wang with the Guangdong Kede Law Firm said.

If the court finds that Apple has infringed on the trademark rights of Shenzhen Proview, its wildly popular iPad tablet computers will be banned from sale on the Chinese mainland.

Wang said the provincial court may uphold the verdict passed by the Shenzhen court in its first trial.

But in a related case heard late last month in Shanghai - where Shenzhen Proview sued Apple's chief distributor in China - the court rejected a request to stop iPad sales.

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线观看免费av网站| 日本免费一区尤物| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕一冢本 | 亚洲人成网7777777国产| 狠狠色狠狠色很很综合很久久| 嘟嘟嘟www在线观看免费高清| 青青青国产精品一区二区| 国产真人无码作爱免费视频| 91在线你懂的| 在线看免费毛片| china成人快色| 妞干网免费在线视频| 中文字幕aⅴ人妻一区二区| 日日躁夜夜躁狠狠天天| 久久成人国产精品一区二区| 最近韩国免费观看hd电影国语| 亚洲国产精品综合福利专区| 永久免费在线观看视频| 伊人狠狠色丁香综合尤物| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 成人女人a毛片在线看| 久久午夜福利电影| 日韩美视频网站| 亚洲av本道一区二区三区四区| 欧美成人免费全部观看天天性色| 亚洲综合欧美日韩| 狠狠色狠狠色综合网| 免费观看国产网址你懂的| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产aaaaaaa毛片| 色国产在线观看| 国产一级不卡毛片| 蜜桃一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码| 韩国精品视频在线观看| 国产国产成年年人免费看片| 麻豆精品不卡国产免费看| 国产成人精品免费午夜app| 另类视频区第一页| 国产日产欧洲无码视频| 激情综合网五月|