A U.S. federal judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of domestic phone records is likely unconstitutional.
This is a first significant legal setback for the secret intelligence surveillance program since it was first revealed by defense contractor Edward Snowden in June.
In his 68-page opinion, Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C., found that the plaintiffs of the lawsuit against the Obama administration had demonstrated "a substantial likelihood" of the NSA's domestic phone scooping program violating the Fourth Amendment, which bans unreasonable searches and seizures.
"I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon.
Leon granted a request from activist Larry Klayman, one of the two plaintiffs, for a preliminary injunction to block the NSA's phone records collection. But the judge put off enforcing his order to allow for an appeal by the government.
This is the first time a court has ruled against the NSA's massive surveillance program on U.S. phones since June.
The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have also brought separate lawsuits challenging the program, which the intelligence community and the Obama administration have defended as important to protect national security against terrorism.
"I have significant doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism," he wrote. "The government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA's bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature."
The judge even compared the NSA phone program to George Orwell' s 1984.
"The almost-Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user is unlike anything that could be conceived in 1979," he wrote.
The government lawyers argued that a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in Smith v. Maryland case, found no search warrant was needed by police on phone surveillance. But Leon said such a ruling of over 30 years old may not be applicable to surveillance programs in recent years, as people in 2013 have "an entirely difference relationship with their phones" than 34 years ago.
"The ubiquity of phones has dramatically altered the quantity of information that is available and, more importantly, what that information can tell the government about people's lives," he wrote.
At a daily press briefing shortly after the ruling, White House spokesman Jay Carney referred the inquiries to the Justice Department. The Justice Department spokesman Andrew Ames said the department is still reviewing the federal court's decision.
主站蜘蛛池模板： 日本免费网站观看| 欧美黑人巨大xxxxx| 国产性生交xxxxx免费| 99re5在线精品视频热线| 成人免费夜片在线观看| 久久久精品午夜免费不卡| 极品丝袜乱系列集合大全目录| 亚洲欧美另类久久久精品能播放的| 真实国产乱子伦沙发睡午觉| 啊用力太猛了啊好深视频| 香港国产特级一级毛片| 国产日韩欧美网站| 俄罗斯乱理伦片在线观看| 在线欧美日韩精品一区二区| mikko四只小动物的名字| 成人午夜福利视频| 国产a级小龙女乱理片| 99久热任我爽精品视频| 国产精品一级片| 3d动漫精品一区二区三区| 国色天香精品一卡2卡3卡| a4yy私人影院| 奇米影视亚洲春色| 一个人免费视频观看在线www| 成人爱做日本视频免费| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 日本免费人成黄页网观看视频| 乱中年女人伦av一区二区| 欧美乱人妖大交xxxx| 亚洲性久久久影院| 欧美老少配性视频播放| 亚洲综合综合在线| 男插女青青影院| 免费无码黄十八禁网站在线观看| 精品无人区一区二区三区a| 哪个网站可以看毛片| 美女被的在线网站91| 国产99视频在线观看| 色哟哟精品视频在线观看| 国产一区二区精品久久91| 色吊丝免费观看网站|