A new label for US diplomacy in Obama era

 
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, January 21, 2010
Adjust font size:

Barack Obama on Jan. 20, 2009, told the American people that the United States was deeply involved in a roaring financial tsunami and two stubborn wars.

The president also said the US was facing severe security threats and challenges, and that his administration would be committed to leading America out of its difficulties.

By introducing "smart power" into foreign policy, the Obama administration expects a restoration of U.S. dominance in the international system.

It also expects a structure of global collective cooperation to address the threats and challenges, and an external impetus to revive the U.S. economy.

All of the above are core goals of the Obama White House's political agenda.

Today, a year later, more and more American people, who were waiting for the "change" promised by the president, have gradually seen that the difficulties remain firmly in their life. Some of them, maybe, have realized that Mr. President is not Moses leading the Exodus after all.

Critics say that the administration's diplomacy in its first year has brought nothing meaningful for U.S. security. Others, however, argue that by using "smart power," the administration improved America's image and is restoring leadership in the international system.

Relations with major powers, particularly the European Union, Russia and China, are always top priorities in U.S. foreign policy.

Though strategic mutual trust with Moscow and Beijing remains insufficient, the Obama administration in its first year has steadily developed relations with Russia and China. That would be one of the few highlights in U.S. diplomacy.

However, those stubborn issues, including wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, nuclear stalemates in Iran and the Korean peninsula, and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, have almost made no progress.

Analysts say that the United States will lose the war in Afghanistan and that Tehran's tough stance on its nuclear program has sentenced the administration's "engagement" policy to death.

In the first year, the Obama administration has shown more initiative to demonstrate that the U.S. is seeking solutions through multilateral mechanisms for a variety of global challenges and security threats, including the G-20 for financial crisis, COP15 for climate change, the Six-Party talks for the nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula and P5+1 for Iran's nuclear stalemate.

"U.S. is back." As an important declaration, the administration has vowed to return to the "sphere of influence" in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia, where U.S. leadership deteriorated during the Bush era.

Beside showing goodwill to Iran, Washington has also beefed up its interactions with Cuba, Syria, Sudan and Myanmar. The effect, however, still remains unclear.

Robert Kagan, a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Obama is a "super idealist" and his idealism has made his so-called "pragmatic" foreign policy develop nothing meaningful on tough international issues.

Joseph Nye, who introduced "smart power" from an international politics conception into U.S. foreign policy, viewed the administration's performance in its first year as "good start."

He praised Obama for restoring U.S. soft power through a series of "symbolic gesture and speeches."

"These will be the tests on which historians will grade him a decade from now," Nye siad, "But while his current course grade is incomplete, he is off to a much better start than his critics admit."

Whatever the criticism or praise is, for U.S. diplomacy in the Obama administration's first year, a recognized fact is that the United States stands as the only super power, and that in the foreseeable future the only adversary capable of defeating it will be the United States itself.

The "smart power," like other doctrines held by the previous administrations, is just a label for U.S. foreign policy.

All of the doctinres have a common and unshakable goal: to prolong and preserve U.S. dominance in the international system.

As Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said, smart power is a "blend of principle and pragmatism."

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 97精品一区二区视频在线观看| 午夜精品久久久久久| 中文字幕日韩人妻不卡一区| 浪潮AV色综合久久天堂| 国产成人A亚洲精V品无码| 521色香蕉网站在线观看| 精品久久久久久亚洲精品| 国产精品嫩草影院在线| 中文字幕美日韩在线高清| 日韩精品无码专区免费播放 | 本子库里番acg全彩无遮挡| 免费观看a级毛片| 丰满熟妇乱又伦| 一级片在线视频| 欧美成人免费一级人片| 国产一级黄色片子| 91w乳液78w78wyw5| 成人免费福利视频| 亚洲AV无码成人黄网站在线观看| 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲产成人| 国产亚洲婷婷香蕉久久精品| 88av在线视频| 在线日韩av永久免费观看| 中文字幕乱视频| 最近手机中文字幕1页| 亚洲国产精品综合久久20| 永久免费bbbbbb视频| 四虎最新永久免费视频| 蜜汁肉桃h全篇| 国产精品jizz在线观看免费| mm1313亚洲国产精品无码试看| 成人无码午夜在线观看| 久久精品国产一区二区电影| 狠狠穞老司机的福67194| 国产免费一区二区三区免费视频| 黑人巨大白妞出浆| 国产综合色在线视频区| 一级黄色片网站| 日本道色综合久久影院| 亚洲欧美国产精品专区久久| 美女福利视频一区|