California gay marriage trial closes

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua via Agencies, June 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

The historic trial over same-sex marriage in California ends on Wednesday, with the case now in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker, according to media reports.

Walker is being asked to decide whether California voters violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of due process and equal protection when they passed a referendum in November 2008 to amend the state constitution, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Attorney Charles Cooper, arguing on behalf of Proposition 8 backers, maintained that society is entitled to reserve its approval of marriage for those who can naturally conceive children.

"The marital relationship is fundamental to the existence and survival of the race," Cooper said in closing arguments before a packed San Francisco courtroom.

The reason the state regulates marriage, he said, is to steer "procreative sexual relationships" into a stable family environment so that children can be raised by their biological parents.

Cooper's counterpart, former U.S. solicitor general Theodore B. Olson, told Walker that the times called for boldness.

Representing two same-sex couples who want to marry, Olson invoked groundbreaking Supreme Court civil rights decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education, which forbade racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia, which threw out that state's law against interracial marriage.

"Proposition 8 discriminates on the basis of sex the same as Virginia law discriminated on the basis of race," Olson said.

The case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court no matter how District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker rules on the ban. A decision there could determine the fate of same-sex marriage in the United States for years.

California voters approved the ban known as Prop 8 in 2008, dismaying gay advocates and their allies who had hoped the trend-setting state would side with them.

However U.S. voters in state referendums across the nation have consistently opposed same-sex marriage. It is legal in only five states and the District of Columbia due to court and legislative action.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 高能预警韩国双ts超美| avtt亚洲一区中文字幕| 最近中文字幕mv免费高清视频7| 亚洲精品视频免费观看| 粉色视频免费入口| 四虎成年永久免费网站| 韩国免费特一级毛片| 国产欧美日韩综合精品二区| 亚洲第一香蕉视频| 精品亚洲欧美无人区乱码| 国产av人人夜夜澡人人爽 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久自慰 | 欧美性狂猛bbbbbxxxxx| 国产精品无码一区二区三区免费 | 女人与大拘交口述| 一级淫片免费看| 成品人视频ww入口| 久久99国产乱子伦精品免费| 日本高清www无色夜在| 久草福利在线观看| 最近高清中文在线字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产精品乱码在线观看97| 毛片免费在线观看网站| 亚洲高清免费在线观看| 男人j进入女人j内部免费网站| 免费观看成年人网站| 精品国产三级a∨在线欧美| 可以看污视频的网站| 翁熄系列回乡下| 国产99久久亚洲综合精品| 色偷偷的xxxx8888| 国产一级一片免费播放视频| 视频一区二区三区蜜桃麻豆| 国产卡一卡二卡三卡四| 黄色大片在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品丝袜高跟鞋 | 黑人巨大精品大战白人美女| 国产白嫩美女在线观看| 中文天堂最新版www在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久| 中文免费观看视频网站|